![]() ![]() If the entity with which you trusted your keys loses your keys, you take your keys elsewhere.”īut do you know just how many of your keys Facebook has? It’s easy to find out if you know where to look. “But the extensive hack vaporizes those arguments. It was also more secure than creating and remembering dozens of passwords for different sites,” he wrote. The arrangement was convenient - the super was always right there, at the push of a button. “Like a trusty superintendent in a Brooklyn walk-up, Facebook offered to carry keys for every lock online. New York Times tech columnist Farhad Manjoo, for one, has sworn off Facebook Login for good. Attackers were exploiting a security flaw that gave them full access to 50 million Facebook accounts, meaning they could also get into connected food delivery apps, fitness trackers, ride-share services and much, much more, like this … Wi-Fi enabled sous-vide?įacebook says there’s “ no evidence” on its end that attackers improperly accessed any third-party apps, but the whole episode has inspired hand-wringing over just how much access we turn over to one service. If you’re logged in with Facebook, you’re logged in anywhere else. The issue here is Facebook Login, a service that lets you access other accounts around the web without managing another password. But this data breach goes way beyond Facebook, and it’s worth wading into the site’s thicket of privacy settings to see where else you might have been compromised. ![]() ![]() Maybe you were one of them, and maybe you even took a minute to change your password. Each episode is 15 mins long, with extended podcasts available on BBC Sounds.Last week, 90 million people had to log back into Facebook following a cyberattack. The new ten-part BBC Radio 4 series and podcast - Shock & War: Iraq 20 years on - is out now. He added: “But I got to tell you, my personal belief, we would have invaded Iraq if Saddam Hussein had a rubber band, a paperclip, and somebody would have said, Oh, he's going to put your eye out. Retired CIA Operations Officer and Chief of Iraq Operations, Luis Rueda was also interviewed for the series and admitted that “we were wrong about the weapons of mass destruction”. Spy chiefs spoken to for the podcast defend the intelligence they provided to the UK government with former head of MI6 Sir Richard Dearlove describing accusations he was too close to Downing Street as “ridiculous”. The new series also looks at what was going on inside the British Secret Service in the run up to the war – including questions over weapons of mass destruction and the complex relationship between spies and politicians. He said that he felt if he had not fully engaged with the invasion, the relationship between the US and UK would have suffered as a result. Mr Blair said he viewed confronting Saddam Hussein as a matter of principle and was “sure that our alliance depended on us doing this together.” President Bush, fearing his ally would lose a vote in parliament on the eve of war, said the UK did not need to the participate in the early stages of the assault, but the prime minister turned it down. In the series, Mr Blair also defended not stepping back from the path to war when President George Bush told him the UK could back out of the initial invasion and instead help with the aftermath. “It was the British prime minister.Today we're out of Europe and would Joe Biden pick up the phone to Rishi Sunak first? I'm not sure.” He said: “When I was prime minister, there was no doubt either under President Clinton or President Bush, who the American president picked up the phone to first. In a new radio series looking back on the invasion of Iraq in 2003, Mr Blair spoke about Britain’s standing with American presidents in the lead up to the war. Tony Blair has said the UK’s relationship with the US has deteriorated since he was prime minister. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |